Editorial standards · Updated July 24, 2026
Clear about who wrote it, how it was checked, and what it can support.
White Shoe publishes practical educational material for lawyers and legal teams. These standards govern research, AI assistance, attribution, updates, and corrections.
Who publishes
Articles with an organization byline are published by the White Shoe AI Editorial Team. A named author or reviewer is shown only when that person actually wrote or reviewed the work and approved attribution.
How sources are used
For legal and regulatory topics, we prioritize statutes, rules, agencies, courts, and professional-responsibility authorities. Industry research is identified as such. A reference list is not a claim that every sentence has been independently verified.
How AI is used
AI may assist with outlines, editing, source discovery, formatting, and quality checks. Human publishers remain responsible for the final page. We do not represent AI-assisted text as independent legal review.
Claims and examples
Product facts come from maintained product and pricing sources. Quantitative performance claims require a named source, transparent methodology, or clear labeling as an illustrative model. Unsupported claims are removed.
Updates and corrections
Changing legal and product facts are reviewed when a material change is identified. Dates are updated only after substantive review. Corrections should identify the affected page and the factual issue.
What the content is not
White Shoe AI is a software company, not a law firm. Educational content and software output do not create an attorney-client relationship or replace advice from qualified counsel.
Request a correction
Send the page URL, disputed statement, and supporting authority to [email protected]. For product help, visit Support.